Friday, October 17, 2008
PeP Links
Thursday, October 16, 2008
PeP Links
Greg Mankiw Readers: Welcome
More on Krugman
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
The National Review Needs to Cease Publication
Monday, October 13, 2008
Paul Krugman Wins the Nobel
Friday, October 10, 2008
Good News: Morbid Version
Interesting Paragraph
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Higher Education Forum
Questions for the Candidates
Saturday, October 04, 2008
The Roots
The Juice is Going to Jail
Friday, October 03, 2008
Bailout Passed
My TakeAway From the Debate
Thursday, October 02, 2008
More Thoughts on Palin
Sarah Palin, the Perfecting of Bush
Great Article on McCain from the Rolling Stone
Medicare to Stop Paying for Errors
Gwen Ifill
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Senate Passes Bailout
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Fat is Good
Thoughts on Paulson
Next Step
Retail Banking Sector
Badass
Bailout Failed
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Mighty McCain
Android: iPhone Killer?
A Bailout For Everyone
The New New York
Peter Orzag on the Bailout
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
A Better Alternative
"True just sending money is not incentive compatible. But there is no reason to bail out homeowners. Just intervene in any mortgage default. Seize the property and continue making the mortgage payments. In the short run rent the property back to the homeowner.
This is what I have been advocating to my colleagues. I don't know why it is not under discussion. Before going with the arbitrary implememtation that Paulson is proposing now there should be some convincing argument that it's more efficient than this alternative. It is clearly the most direct approach and therefore should be the default (so to speak.)"
Here is another post along the same lines from Cowen.
McCain Suspends Campaign
Health and Taxes
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
More on the Bailout
VP Debates
George Will on McCain
Stop The Presses
Monday, September 22, 2008
I Wish This Were on Ebay
More Thoughts on the Bailout
Mark Cuban's Thoughts on the Meltdown
New World/New Media
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Congress Members Getting Hosed
Saturday, September 20, 2008
More Thoughts on the 1 Trillion Dollar Bailout
Friday, September 19, 2008
Obama Wins the Beer Test
1 Trillion Dollar Bailout
Thursday, September 18, 2008
More Reading
This Has to be Something from the Onion
The Cost of Cleaning Up
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Morgan Stanley Is On the Clock
More Reading
"The Bush administration, the Fed and Congress, meanwhile, continue to focus on the immediate crises, with little attention to the underlying reasons that the economy has gotten into this mess — a stagnation of incomes, an explosion of debt and a decidedly outdated, and limp, approach to government oversight. Remarkably, the presidential campaign has gotten less serious, while the economy’s problems have become more so."
Meltdown Coverage
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
BTW
Google Chrome
Monday, September 15, 2008
Palin Needs Schooling ASAP
"GIBSON: So let me summarize the three things that you’d change in the Bush economic plans. One, two, three.
PALIN: Reduce taxes, control spending, reform the oversight and the overseeing agencies and committees to make sure that America’s dollars and investments are protected.
GIBSON: So let me break some of those down. You talk about spending. How much smaller would a McCain budget be? Where would you cut?
PALIN: We’re going to find efficiencies in every department. We have got to. There are some things that I think should be off the table. Veterans’ programs, off the table. You know, we owe it to our veterans and that’s the greatest manifestation that we can show in terms of support for our military, those who are in public service fighting for America. …It’s to make sure that our veterans are taken care of and the promises that we’ve made to them are fulfilled.
GIBSON: So you’d take military off the table, the veterans’ benefits. That’s 20 percent of the budget. & Do you talk about entitlement reform? Is there money you can save in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid?
PALIN: I am sure that there are efficiencies that are going to be found in all of these agencies. I’m confident in that."
Palin is pulling the whole fraud, waste and abuse line. Repeat after me: the government is an insurance company with a side business in defense. If you are going to try to bring the budget into balance on the spending side you will have to tackle a combination of defense, medicare, medicaid, and social security.To be fair, this is not necessarily a fair reflection of Palin's knowledge or lack of knowledge. Many on the right have been peddling this bullshit for ages. This has been a pet peeve of mine for awhile.
hat tip: economist mom
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Palin About to Get Schooled...
Don't Look at Your 401(k) Anytime Soon
Earmarks, continued

Here is a pie graph courtesy of Mark Thoma that shows the portion of the federal budget that earmarks constitute (it's the barely visible sliver). McCain's plan to bring the budget into balance by eliminating earmarks is simply not credible. Remember, the government is an insurance company with a side business in defense. That is where the money is and thus where any savings will have to come from.
Friday, September 12, 2008
More on Attack Ads
The Beginning of the Fall
hat tip: Ezra Klein
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Crappy Sports Names
The People's History of the United States
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
The Social Security Trust Fund
'the obligations of the [Social Security] trust fund aren't tangible obligations fungible with other government debt. But at the same time they are obligations: they oblige the government to issue debt in the future, insofar as its tax revenue won't be able to cover its pension promises.'
A trust fund = an obligation to borrow? If your uncle Louie told you he was setting up a trust fund for you, and its assets consisted of his obligation to borrow the money, how secure would you feel?
On the other hand, you may feel confident that Uncle Sam will always be able to borrow. Don't be so sure. A few months ago, one might have thought that Uncle Freddie and Aunt Fannie would always be able to borrow. That ended rather suddenly.
What do you like better about Sam? His balance sheet? His management team?"
This is one of the things I have never understood when those who claim that Social Security is not a problem or even has a strong financial position. The trust fund presently has $5 trillion dollars worth of obligations that we have pissed away. These are funds that will have to be paid out between 2018-2040. To state Social Security's finances are in sound shape presumes faith in the taxpayers willingness to accept higher marginal tax rates to redeem those bonds in the trust fund. I don't share that faith.Earmarks and the Bridge to Nowhere
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
What I'm Listening to
Sunday, September 07, 2008
PeP Updates
Ta-Nahisi Coates is a blogger for the Atlantic and blogs about anything and everything. I find him fascinating and he discusses race and culture extensively in a manner that is seldom found on the blog0sphere or elsewhere.
Friday, September 05, 2008
The Things Campaigns Do to You
long-run fiscal situation – is to replace the employer exclusion with a tax credit, a step that has been proposed many times before (e.g., Butler 1991 and Pauly and Hoff 2002). Firms would still be allowed to deduct the cost of their contributions to employee premiums, just as they can deduct wages and other expenses today for the purpose of calculating taxable income. But workers would now have to include employer contributions to health insurance in their earnings for the purpose of calculating taxes (precisely which taxes is discussed below). In exchange for, workers who purchased qualifying insurance would get a refundable tax credit. Qualifying insurance would be along the lines proposed by the President in his standard deduction for health insurance, including limits on out-of-pocket payments, coverage of a general range of medical care, and guaranteed renewability by the provider (Treasury 2008)."
This is a pretty fair description of the McCain health care plan. The funny thing is, this is not be found in McCain campaign literature or on his senate website, but rather in a paper written by Jason Furman, Obama's Economic Policy Director, who now is arguing about the perils of this very plan. Now Furman would probably be right to respond that the McCain plan doesn't go far enough to facilitate risk pooling in the individual market and maybe that the tax credits are insufficient. But the general thrust of the McCain plan is one that he championed before he became an Obama staffer, now his job is to criticize that very plan.
Furman's counterpart in the McCain campaign, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, was a real deficit hawk and had a sterling reputation coming from the CEA and a stint as the CBO director. Now Holtz-Eakin's main task is defending the indefensible, McCain's tax policy. He surely knows that he will not bring the budget with the tax cuts McCain has proposed back into balance merely by curtailing earmarks. But that is the company line.
Both are incredibly intelligent men, highly accomplished in their fields, but their current job description is to say stupid and false things. That is politics.
Here is a video of the two going at it on CNBC and in Arnold Kling's words, "squandering their cognitive surplus."
hat tip: Greg Mankiw and Arnold Kling
random note: Mankiw was actually Furman's dissertation adviser.
Thursday, September 04, 2008
More Thoughts on Palin
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
My Thoughts on Palin
On the plus side, she is a stone cold fox. I think Michelle Obama is immensely attractive and so is Governor Palin and that makes this election much more palatable.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
More Thoughts on Biden
I hasten to add, my observation and the core of my criticism is exceedingly shallow. But alas, so are presidential campaigns and their media coverage.
Biden as VP
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Medicare's Efficiency
Wednesday, August 06, 2008
The Enquirer Sacks John Edwards
Thursday, July 31, 2008
More Fannie and Freddie
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Housing Crisis
Fannie and Freddie
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Brilliant Blog Post on GSE's by Larry Summers
Here is a really good creative capitalism idea. All Americans benefit from increases in home ownership because of the values like hard work, community, and respect for property that ownership instills. Families want desperately to own their own homes and accumulate equity. Yet it is very hard for conventional banks that borrow money over the short term to lend over the kind of 30-year horizons that best help families buy houses.
How can the objective of ownership be best supported and how can the most adequate financing be assured? Voila, creative capitalism! How about chartering private companies as government sponsored enterprises with the mission of promoting home ownership affordability? Give them boards with some private representatives and some public representatives. Make clear that government stands behind their capital market innovations so they can borrow more cheaply and pass the savings on. Exempt them from the state local taxes that others pay. Give them specific objectives on affordability that they must meet. Rely on a special government regulator to assure that they balance their social responsibility with their drive to profit. Harness the profit motive to meet a social objective.
This is roughly the rationale behind Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I would submit that it is about as good or as bad as most creative capitalism ideas involving joint profit making and social objectives. But one hopes that ee are now witnessing the end of this particular experiment in creative capitalism: the government is moving to pick up the pieces of the mess the GSEs have made and their shareholders are losing most of their money.
What went wrong? The illusion that the companies were doing virtuous work made it impossible to build a political case for serious regulation. When there were social failures the companies always blamed their need to perform for the shareholders. When there were business failures it was always the result of their social obligations. Government budget discipline was not appropriate because it was always emphasized that they were "private companies.” But market discipline was nearly nonexistent given the general perception -- now validated -- that their debt was government backed. Little wonder with gains privatized and losses socialized that the enterprises have gambled their way into financial catastrophe.
I wonder how general the lesson here might be. My fear is fairly general. Inherent in the multiple objectives urged for creative capitalists is a loss of accountability with respect to performance. The sense that the mission is virtuous is always a great club for beating down skeptics. When institutions have special responsibilities it is necessary that they be supported in competition to the detriment of market efficiency.
It is hard in this world to do well. It is hard to do good. When I hear a claim that an institution is going to do both, I reach for my wallet. You should too.

